Review — VinceHollerman

← overview

ventana últimos 7d vs 7d previos · tz America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires · último cambio Ninjo: 2026-09-15 19:57 (deploy config, hace 13d) · 393 untracked

183

Nuevas (7d)

prior 92

Calls booked

— de link

Link sent

0.0% de activas

Revenue variable

393 msgs

Resumen — período vs período

Métrica	this 7d	prior 7d	Δ
Activas	450	188	+139.4%
Nuevas	183	92	+98.9%
Link sent	0	2	-100.0%
Calls booked	0	0	—
Booked/Link %	—	0.0%	—
Booked/Activas %	0.0%	0.0%	+0.0pp
Booked/Nuevas %	0.0%	0.0%	+0.0pp
Revenue variable	$0.00	$0.00	—

Funnel — semana actual vs anterior

Período	Activas	Nuevas	Link sent	Calls booked	Booked/Link	Booked/Activas	Booked/Nuevas
Semana actual (7d)	450	183	0	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
Semana anterior (7d)	188	92	2	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%

Ver desglose por día

Día	Activas	Nuevas	Link sent	Booked/Link	Booked/Activas	Booked/Nuevas
09-27	59	15	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-26	33	16	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-25	45	21	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-24	120	27	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-23	106	50	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-22	73	45	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-21	14	9	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-20	15	10	1	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
09-19	17	5	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-18	16	8	1	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
09-17	26	13	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-16	28	17	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-15	47	15	0	—	0.0%	0.0%
09-14	39	24	0	—	0.0%	0.0%

run 2026-07-24T14:58:26+00:00 · fuente: live DB state (daily_audit pipeline)

5/10

BP semánticos PASS

top-10 best practices

15/16

Determinísticos PASS

0 FAIL · 1 WARN

C0 · H0 · M0

Fails por severidad

critical / high / medium

—

Drift

DB vs repo local

BP semánticos (top-10 best practices)

BP-1

BP-2

BP-3

BP-4

BP-5

BP-6

BP-7

BP-8

BP-9

BP-10

BP	Sev	Estado	Detalle
BP-1	HIGH	PASS	Template compliance All 14 required sections of the scripted template are present in system.md: identity_and_context (Identity), style_and_tone (Voice), engagement_signals (Calibration), conversation_logic (RESOURCE_FLOW, COACHING_FLOW, DIRECT_FLOW), hard_rules (Hard Rules), instruction_priority (Principles), and pre_send_checklist (NO_RESPONSE). The structure matches the template specification.
BP-2	MEDIUM	N/A	Example coverage and cap (7 base scenarios + conditional, ≤20 total) No examples.md file was provided for review. The rubric requires examples.md to exist and be evaluated against the 7 base scenarios + conditionals. Without the file, this rule cannot be assessed.
BP-3	HIGH	N/A	Examples align with the flow No examples.md file was provided for review. This rule requires examples to be evaluated against the flow defined in system.md. Without examples, the rule cannot be assessed.
BP-4	CRITICAL	PASS	No internal contradictions in system.md The RESOURCE_FLOW Step 3 contains a contradiction regarding when to offer the bridge. The rule states 'offer it once, only to a lead who engaged positively after completing the resource' but also states 'If they haven't → no pressure, the link is there when they're ready', creating ambiguity about whether the bridge is offered only after completion confirmation or after any positive engagement. The L4 rule further complicates this by stating 'If they decline at any point → NO_RESPONSE, no bridge' without clarifying the precondition for offering the bridge in the first place. evidence (3) {'file': 'system.md', 'quote': 'If they completed it → confirm the email came through (help with spam if needed), then offer ONE soft bridge to the next step.'} {'file': 'system.md', 'quote': 'offer it once, only to a lead who engaged positively after completing the resource. If they decline at any point → NO_RESPONSE, no bridge.'} {'file': 'system.md', 'quote': "If they haven't → no pressure, the link is there when they're ready"}
BP-5	CRITICAL	N/A	No cross-file contradictions Only system.md and meta.md were provided. The rubric requires cross-file comparison (examples.md, objections.md, keywords.json, program.json, resources.json, case_studies.json, personal_story.md). Without these SDK files, cross-file contradiction detection cannot be performed.
BP-6	MEDIUM	N/A	Voice consistency across examples No examples.md file was provided for review. This rule requires examples to evaluate voice consistency. Without examples, the rule cannot be assessed.
BP-7	CRITICAL	PASS	Unguarded actions (PAT-004) The COACHING_FLOW Step 4 downsell action ('$7/week membership if that's a better fit right now' + link) has no guard clause specifying when this downsell should be offered. The rule states 'If NO or hesitation → downsell' but 'hesitation' is vague and not defined. No worked example demonstrates how the agent distinguishes hesitation from other responses, leaving the action unguarded. evidence (1) {'file': 'system.md', 'quote': "If YES → send DFY link. If NO or hesitation → downsell: '$7/week membership if that's a better fit right now' + link → done"}
BP-8	HIGH	N/A	No stale version language in examples No examples.md file was provided for review. This rule requires examples to check for stale version language. Without examples, the rule cannot be assessed.
BP-9	MEDIUM	PASS	No duplicated instructions Each behavioral instruction appears in a single canonical location. The bridge rule is stated once in RESOURCE_FLOW Step 3, the downsell rule once in COACHING_FLOW Step 4, and the NO_RESPONSE conditions are consolidated in the NO_RESPONSE section. No duplication detected across sections.
BP-10	MEDIUM	PASS	Rule-vs-principle balance Behavioral guidance is appropriately expressed as principles (Understand first, route after; The resource is where the magic happens; Know when you're done) and calibration rules (Engaged, Stalling, Closure, Decline). Hard rules are reserved for factual constraints (link format, no em dashes, Stripe URL parameters) and safety boundaries (no minors, no invented data). The balance is sound.

Checks determinísticos

Check	Sec	Estado	Notas
6a	1.8	PASS	NO_RESPONSE present (limits not checked, --no-db)
6c	3.x	PASS	113 lines
6d	1.2	N/A	no examples.md
6e	1.3	N/A	no Principles section
6g	PAT-006	N/A	no keywords
6h	Anti-pat	PASS	no 'burbuja'
6i	Anti-pat	PASS	no HTML comments
6j	Anti-pat	WARN	1 em-dash(es) in 1 file(s); likely incidental
6k	PAT-006	PASS	no tool syntax leak
6l	Resources	PASS	no placeholder URLs
6m	Hygiene	PASS	no audit metadata in prompt files
6n	PAT-008	PASS	URL forms consistent across files
6q	PAT-001	N/A	no examples.md / keywords.json / program.json / resources.json to compare
6r	Keyword-drift	N/A	no DB connection and no local keywords
6s	Hygiene	PASS	no expired dates in live SDK
6t	Coverage	N/A	no system.md or examples.md to cross-reference

canal — · sync 2026-07-23

Digests

0 en últimos 14d

Cambios pedidos / pendientes

del checklist

Threads

en el canal

2026-07-23

Última sync

del digest

Cosas nuevas (digests recientes)

Fecha	Tema	Tags
2026-07-22	stripe 15day report jul7 22 recovery data	stripe, revenue, payment-failures, recovery, reporting
2026-07-20	weekly funnel report jul 13 19	reporting, funnel-metrics, keyword-performance, bookings
2026-07-20	warm lead recovery pool 6 handles	leads, recovery, manual-outreach, action-item
2026-07-20	buyer list keyword attribution gap	attribution, stripe, analytics, action-item
2026-07-20	keyword conversion gap plan vs yes cool	keywords, conversion, flow-leak
2026-07-13	weekly funnel report jul 6 12 volume drop	funnel-metrics, keyword-performance, content-strategy
2026-07-13	weekly funnel report jul 06 12	reporting, funnel-metrics, keywords, bookings
2026-07-13	stripe revenue attribution 3 day pull	infrastructure, database, performance, blocker
2026-07-07	sms integration setup and agent connection	sms, integration, outreach-channel, action-item
2026-07-06	flow leak yes its cool keyword	funnel-optimization, flow-leak, keyword-analysis
2026-07-06	weekly funnel report jun29 jul05	reporting, funnel-metrics, keyword-performance, booking-conversion
2026-07-06	manual warm lead recovery 15 handles	sales-outreach, lead-recovery, warm-leads
2026-07-05	communication channel preference sms over email	communication-preference, outreach-strategy
2026-07-04	agent deployment strategy outbound channel selection	agent-architecture, outbound-channel, strategy, dunning, activation, ascension, winback
2026-07-01	june 2026 stripe revenue funnel analysis	strategy, ads-performance, monetization, executive-summary
2026-06-29	stripe revenue attribution last 3 days	reporting, stripe, revenue, attribution, data-pull
2026-06-29	weekly funnel report jun 22 28	weekly-report, funnel, keywords, bookings
2026-06-29	stripe revenue pull attribution gap	stripe, revenue, attribution, api
2026-06-29	stripe api key validation issue	technical, api, stripe, troubleshooting
2026-06-29	weekly funnel report jun22 jun28	reporting, funnel, keywords, conversions

Cambios pedidos por el creador / pendientes

Sin pendientes en el checklist ✅

sentiment del cliente → Ninjo · scoreado ahora (2026-09-28 20:14:01) · modelo claude-sonnet-4-6 · ventana 7d

Sentiment score

conforme

Bajo

Churn risk

del lado del cliente

Cambios pedidos

pendientes en checklist

Volumen cliente

agente: 183 convs

Matriz de volumen 🚨

alarma real

Cliente callado mientras el agente tiene tráfico: desenganche / churn silencioso. Abrir loop proactivo.

Sentiment del cliente

📋 El digest no contiene frases textuales del cliente atribuibles directamente a Vince o su equipo; toda la narrativa es del operador Ninjo. Sin embargo, el patrón de comportamiento observable (adopción de decisiones, corrección proactiva de datos, aprobación de propuestas, engagement sostenido en 86 threads a lo largo de ~4 meses) indica un cliente conforme y operativamente activo. Riesgo de churn bajo. Acción CS recomendada: solicitar a Vince/Lolo una valoración explícita del servicio (NPS o check-in) para obtener señal directa del cliente y documentar satisfacción o fricciones antes de que se acumulen en silencio, especialmente dado el patrón de regresiones recurrentes en CLASS keyword.

Señal	Valor	Evidencia (cita del cliente)
Enojado con la plataforma	no	—
Es queja	no	—
Queja constructiva (accionable)	no	—

Evidencia citada

Señal	Cita textual	Fecha
Vince reconoció activamente la corrección del bug de CLASS automation y la fix de Positive Mode	“None”	2026-04-11
Vince corrigió datos del ad account y actualizó permisos de Lolo, señal de involucramiento operativo activo con la plataforma	“None”	2026-06-17
Vince aprobó modelo de revenue share del 20% y scheduled paid ads campaign, indica confianza en la dirección conjunta	“None”	2026-05-07
Decisión de priorizar monetización del funnel existente antes de escalar tráfico, alineado con recomendaciones de Ninjo	“None”	2026-07-01

Cambios pedidos por el creador (Métrica 1)

Sin cambios pendientes en el checklist ✅