Review — VinceHollerman

All 14 required sections of the scripted template are present in system.md: identity_and_context (Identity), style_and_tone (Voice), engagement_signals (Calibration), conversation_logic (RESOURCE_FLOW, COACHING_FLOW, DIRECT_FLOW), hard_rules (Hard Rules), instruction_priority (Principles), and pre_send_checklist (NO_RESPONSE). The structure matches the template specification.

No examples.md file was provided for review. The rubric requires examples.md to exist and be evaluated against the 7 base scenarios + conditionals. Without the file, this rule cannot be assessed.

No examples.md file was provided for review. This rule requires examples to be evaluated against the flow defined in system.md. Without examples, the rule cannot be assessed.

The RESOURCE_FLOW Step 3 contains a contradiction regarding when to offer the bridge. The rule states 'offer it once, only to a lead who engaged positively after completing the resource' but also states 'If they haven't → no pressure, the link is there when they're ready', creating ambiguity about whether the bridge is offered only after completion confirmation or after any positive engagement. The L4 rule further complicates this by stating 'If they decline at any point → NO_RESPONSE, no bridge' without clarifying the precondition for offering the bridge in the first place.

Only system.md and meta.md were provided. The rubric requires cross-file comparison (examples.md, objections.md, keywords.json, program.json, resources.json, case_studies.json, personal_story.md). Without these SDK files, cross-file contradiction detection cannot be performed.

No examples.md file was provided for review. This rule requires examples to evaluate voice consistency. Without examples, the rule cannot be assessed.

The COACHING_FLOW Step 4 downsell action ('$7/week membership if that's a better fit right now' + link) has no guard clause specifying when this downsell should be offered. The rule states 'If NO or hesitation → downsell' but 'hesitation' is vague and not defined. No worked example demonstrates how the agent distinguishes hesitation from other responses, leaving the action unguarded.

No examples.md file was provided for review. This rule requires examples to check for stale version language. Without examples, the rule cannot be assessed.

Each behavioral instruction appears in a single canonical location. The bridge rule is stated once in RESOURCE_FLOW Step 3, the downsell rule once in COACHING_FLOW Step 4, and the NO_RESPONSE conditions are consolidated in the NO_RESPONSE section. No duplication detected across sections.

Behavioral guidance is appropriately expressed as principles (Understand first, route after; The resource is where the magic happens; Know when you're done) and calibration rules (Engaged, Stalling, Closure, Decline). Hard rules are reserved for factual constraints (link format, no em dashes, Stripe URL parameters) and safety boundaries (no minors, no invented data). The balance is sound.